| When in the
course of progressive paradigms, it becomes advisable (after due regard
to the legitimate hopes and aspirations of dissenters) for one
heterogeneous society to demonstrate a right to non-agreement with a
separate legislative entity, and to seek positive recognizance as
a synonymous body politic, appropriately substantiated by the Supreme
Deity/Deities/Objects of Worship (depending upon each
individual's similarly valued religious beliefs) a non-opinionated cultural tolerance to the temporary inconclusary
mental acceptances of personhood offensively pre-assumes that they may
at their considered discretion democratically communicate the
exceptional occurrences which spacially inconvenience them to the
non-combination.
We wish to propose these ambiverities to
be popularly acceptable, that all ambigenic persons are biologically
introduced non-discriminatorily, that they are similarly centrically
provided by humankind with certain retained assumptions, that among
these are biological viability, optional opportunity and the voluntary
acceptance of individually favorable sensory fulfillment.--That to
confirm these assumtuals, democratic institutions are the global norm,
maintaining their non-oppressive hegemony through the tacit approval of
society, --That whenever any governmental structure becomes
counter-productive to these legitimate aspirations, it is admissible for
the community to re-substantiate or dis-substantiate and to elect a
terminologically advantaged alternative, based on aspirational
expectations and creating a favorable infrastructure capable of
maintaining mutually advantageous circumstances for the global family.
Consideration of alternative scenarios will indeed suggest that
traditional, popularly acceptable establishments may be considered
unsuitable for regime change for superficially non-strategic reasons and
his/herstory shows that persons are mindful to acquiesce to imperfect
situations rather than to contra-accept the status quo. However, should
a terminologically excessive sequence of non-standard actions and
arbitrary undemocratic considerations indicate am imminent likelihood of
capitalistic patriarchal hegemonic discourse, it is their popularly
agreed non-obligation to decline acceptance of this administration, and
to agree policies for peaceful co-existence. Circumstances in these
culturally imperialistic regions have been less than perfect and the
need for constitutional change is now paramount. The his/herstory of the
phallogeneric reigndom of Britain is a database of alleged proprietorial
imperfections calculated to contribute towards a lack of regional social
viability. To confirm the non-contradictory nature of this hypothesis,
present the case for popular critical analysis.
He has incompletely approved communally
beneficial obligatory customary codifications.
He has negatively assented to the mandate
of arbitrarily imposed councilors and has been dilatorially active in
the de-imposition of his veto.
He has convened inconvenient assemblies,
location-wise, with consequent energy depletionary affects upon
attendees.
He has destabilized democratic assemblies
for negatively synergizing with his socio-oppressional tendencies.
He has adversely encouraged the
integration of non-indigenous populations into the community.
He has counter-improved the concept of
democratic accountability by the non-appointment of factual assessors.
He has established dictatorial and
fiduciary precedence over factual assessors.
He has created non-beneficial
bureaucracies.
We have been given a non-consensual
allocation of security measures.
A martial disciplinary system has been
superimposed over the democratic institution.
He has introduced involuntary
non-traditional practices and enacted ethically dysfunctional
ordinances:
For the heterogeneous distribution of
ordinance-empowered military personnel.
For excusing their neighborly acts, such
as the terminal inconvenience of community members;
For contributing towards unsynchronic
financial relationships with the global market;
For requesting non-discretionary
financial contributions;
For negatively empowering our community
leaders to arbitrate on factual matters;
For situationally transposing
jurisprudence;
For encouraging non-compliance with
traditional practice and promoting acquiescence to new legislative
paradigms;
For instituting alternative systems of
macro management;
For assuming an unrequested executive hegemony;
He has taken us into protective custody
with the declared intention of freeing us from our previous oppressors
and re-building our economy which has been destroyed, for our own good,
by his just and surgical strikes;
He has exploited the natural wildlife of
our oceans, disturbed our coastal ecology, inflicted collateral damage
on our cities and offended against our human rights.
Along with his coalition allies, he has
inflicted civilian casualties which he claims are regrettable but
unavoidable;
He has encouraged demonstrative outbursts
against acceptance of the prevailing socio-economic situation
particularly amongst members of the indigenous populations whose
legitimate concerns about albinocentric monoculturalism have such merit
that they occasionally result in seemingly-inappropriate behavior
patterns.
Our frequent requests for compensation
have met with negative approval.
We have raised our concerns with our
British siblings that their legislature proposes to interdict our decolonization
and we have reiterated our narrative about our bioregional exchange. We
have appealed to their cultural sensitivity to show non-support for
these socially divisive actions but they have been aurally
inconvenienced and differently logical. We must therefore consider them
to be factually not dissimilar to all other non-aligned identity groups;
partners during periods of stability and co-prosperity, involuntary
combatants during the exercise of our legitimate foreign policy.
We therefore, the democratically
empowered negotiants of the United States of America, appeal to the
Supreme Deity, Deities or Objects of Worship to witness the
non-discriminatory nature of our aspirations for an alternative paradigm
and with the consensual approval of the community we propose to reclaim
our executive franchise and expedite our decolonization from the
cultural imperialism of the monarch of England and, as an autonomous
entity, perform our regulatory, statutory and commercial perspectives,
and in unambivalent cognizance of the preservation of our well being by
the Supreme Deity/Deities/O of Ws etc we mutually interface our
biological viabilities, temporary custodial advantages and individually
perceived moral sufficiencies.
And if that doesn't work, we'll Nuke
the bastards.
Make love,
not war. Co-create fraternal liaisons of an amatory conceptual
purpose at the
UK Singles Club dating agency
!
|